Consider the various nature essays and excerpts we've examined recently (“Save the Whales, Screw the Shrimp,” “The End of Nature,” Walden, Emerson's "Nature") as distinct examples of persuasive rhetoric. Which do you think is the most effective? Why? (note: yeah, you should discuss with is better in a general sense, but more specifically this question is asking you to examine which text best achieves its intended effect - whatever you deem that to be.)
- For this entry you'll have to discuss, to varying degrees, each text's main idea (their theses), and you'll have to provide direct quotes from each. Naturally, you'll be focusing more so on one more so than the others.
Okay. Two rhetorical analyses in the can, one to go. For this journal entry, briefly reflect on the experience thus far - what have you learned? Listen to my feedback and consider the following:
- Is there any aspect that was more challenging than you thought it'd be?
- Have you found something surprisingly easy?
- What have you gotten right about the process?
- How do you plan on improving the next time?
- How can you take the various rhetorical strategies you're analyzing and implement them in your own writing, making you a stronger writer (because really, that's the point)?
- What questions do you have for me?
Don't feel as though you have to address all of the questions above, or address them in equal measure.
As you get your first timed writing back, you must listen to the audio feedback I've left you and for this journal entry set (at least) two concrete goals for improving your writing/analysis next time.
In addition to listing your goals, provide a brief rational as to why you chose each.
In what you are designating as your AP Language and Composition Journal, complete the following for each of the five essays where different writers offer different takes on the idea of happiness (in the heading, somewhere indicate that this is journal entry #2 – you’re also encouraged to give the entry some sort of clever title):
Identify the phrase/sentence/passage you feel best encapsulates the main idea, purpose (or thesis). (What are they saying about happiness?)
As you go through, identify specific instances where the writer uses some of the stylistic elements elaborated on in last night’s reading – that’s anything from sentence structure (length, parallelism, etc.), to punctuation, to diction (word choice), to figurative language (tropes, schemes). And try to go broad with this; don’t just pick out the metaphors in each essay. In addition, write a little bit about the effect of these choices – think about how the writer’s style works with what the writer’s saying.
Finally, for each essay, write a little bit about how the author’s definition of happiness compares to your own? Was your idea of happiness challenged? Confirmed? Try to be specific (vivid, concrete) with regards to both the text and your own thinking.
And here are links to the essays:
Complete the rhetorical analysis for the Caesar Chavez excerpt (annotate the prompt/passage, outline your essay, and ultimately, attempt to write the essay itself).
Think about your own experience as a writer. To what extent do you think you’ve cultivated a distinct style? What are some things that have helped, or impeded this process?
Looking back through the “Style in Argument” chapter, which stylistic elements do you feel fit you best, the way you naturally think and express yourself? For example, my cognitive process like 90% analogy-reliant, and I find myself frequently interrupting my thoughts to clarify my thoughts. As a result, my writing tends to be analogy-heavy, and I tend to use a lot of appositive phrases – you know non-essential, clarifying interruptions set off by dashes, my favorite form of punctuation.
Set some goals for yourself this semester: which stylistic elements do you want to become more competent with as you develop a more authentic voice in your writing?